Trailing 2-1 in the 8th-inning of Sunday's game, the Phils were desperately trying to avoid a sixth-straight loss. With 1-out, Rollins grounded to Orioles' first baseman Ty Wigginton, attempting to avoid the tag on his way to first. A replay of the incident showed that Rollins did in fact elude the tag, but was called out by first base umpire Larry Vanover. Victorino was the next batter, who doubled to left field. Rollins may have been the tying run. They lost 2-1!
Why is it that umpires can't get their calls right? Don't get me wrong, I don't expect them to be perfect, but there are ways to minimize their errors. For instance: Last week, the Phils were in the 11th-inning of a tie-game against the Red Sox, when Greg Dobbs hit a ball that appeared to go directly over the fair/foul pole. It was called foul. If fair, it would have been a 3-run home-run, and the Phils would have won. They went on to lose.
Was it a fair ball? I'm not positive about that, but I'm pretty sure the use of instant replay would have been more than applicable on that particular play. You have the two previous World Series winners playing each other, battling for first place in their respective divisions. This was a crucial game for both teams. It is important to a call like that right! Instead, the first base umpire assured Charlie Manual he got a good look at it, and without a doubt, knew it was foul.
Well, he's a better man than me. I saw it on replay - a bunch of times - and I'm still not sure if it was fair or foul.
Follow the NFL: One thing the NFL does that you rarely see in baseball, the whole crew working together to make a right call. How many times do you see NFL officials gather together (all of them) and discuss what happened? At least then, if the call is wrong, you don't feel cheated. Somehow it doesn't feel as bad when they make an actual effort to get the call right. Make sure everybody is on the same page!
Baseball is a different story. How many people consider MLB Umpires arrogant? I'll bet that number is high! They never ask for help, insist they got the call right, and that's all there is to it. Argue it, and your tossed from the game.
Going back to the Dobbs incident, why was the use of instant replay not used? Even if the ump was sure of his call, I need somebody to explain to me why it is not wise to at least look at the video, to make sure he got the call right. Maybe it was a time issue - I mean, what would it take - about a minute? Can't afford to lose that kind of time in the worlds slowest moving game.
Rollins Was Safe: So after reviewing the play, it is clear that Rollins was safe at first. He was the tying run, that may have scored when Victorino doubled to left. And when Manual questioned the call, he was tossed from the game.
Is there any reason Vanover didn't seek any help? I would have like to see a few of the umps get together, talk it over, then come to a decision. Obviously certain guys are in a position to make the call and others are not. Your not going to ask the third base ump if the tag was missed at first. But, there's a good chance the home plate ump got a good look at it.
How to Make Them Accountable: This is really a good question. There are many ideas that can put the pressure on an ump to get it right, many of which, only sound good in theory.
- Demotion: This is the obvious solution. If you get your calls wrong, your going to the minors. The problem here is that there is rarely an Umpire that is flat-out terrible. Usually, it is the Umpires in general, that get calls wrong across the whole league. You can't demote everybody!
- Fines: How about fines? "Hey Mr. Vanover, you tossed Charlie Manual out of a game for arguing a call he was right on. You will be fined X-amount of dollars." Well, it sounds like a possible solution, but I don't think it's the answer. We all make mistakes at work!
- Press Conference: I would like to see this, but I'm not sure this is appropriate. What if the Umpire was forced to do a press conference interview after the game? Wouldn't it be great to show him the clip of Rollins eluding the tag, and make him explain his stance to everybody? If anything, you may start to ask the other Umpires for their opinion before you make an arrogant stance on the call if you know your going to get drilled by the media.
Again, these possible solutions are not really answers. In fact, the idea is not to make an Umpire better, but to ensure he is making the right call. Fact: Umpires miss calls. Fining a guy is not going to give him a better look at the play. But if he doesn't get a good look at the play, he needs to realize he didn't have the best look, and figure out how to make the best call he can. That means getting an opinion from somebody else - "hey, what did you see?" - not "well, I'm calling him out, and I'm sticking to it!"
If nobody else had a better look at the play - which will most often be the case - then stick to the original call. At least if it is wrong, you know they tried to get it right. I think that would go a long way - well, maybe not in Philly! Feel free to throw any ideas/suggestions on how you think MLB Umpires can improve.